Home »
Misc »
How many division 1 men's basketball teams are there
How many division 1 men's basketball teams are there
List of Division 1 Basketball Colleges
Men’s basketball recruits looking to compete at the highest collegiate level—and have the physical measurables and athletic skills to back it up—should highly consider NCAA Division 1 basketball colleges during their recruiting process. Student-athletes who compete at D1 basketball schools not only meet highly competitive recruiting guidelines set by these elite schools but are also among the best student-athletes in the nation. Unfortunately, while being a top basketball player on your high school or club team may help you stand out in a crowd, potential recruits should be prepared for the highest level of competition among not only high school athletes, but also current student-athletes competing at junior colleges with basketball programs, as these players are often recruited by four-year D1 basketball schools too. Check out our Nike basketball camp article.
Related Articles
- Check out this article on Duke basketball recruiting.
![]()
- How does Illinois basketball recruiting work?
- What are the NCAA Transfer Rules?
- How are NCAA basketball teams organized?
There is an extremely high caliber set for student-athletes who land roster spots on D1 basketball teams. Getting to the D1 level—and staying there—requires an extremely high level of dedication, passion for the sport and hard work. However, the payoffs of competing at Division 1 basketball colleges is well worth the effort. Top D1 basketball schools are among the most popular in the nation, and many student-athletes—and their non-athletic peers alike—recognize and root for powerhouse Division 1 basketball programs like University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill and Duke University. Athletes who have the talent, physical measurables, drive and academics will be rewarded with well-funded athletic facilities, experienced coaches to take their game to the next level and even a chance at a partial or fully funded athletic scholarship offer.
Likewise, players at top D1 basketball colleges will have a chance to enjoy national recognition and respect from dedicated fans. Learn more about the basketball recruiting rankings process.
How many colleges are in Division 1 men’s basketball?
Student-athletes looking to compete at the highest collegiate level have plenty of options. But just how many colleges are in Division 1 men’s basketball? There are currently more than 350 Division 1 basketball colleges in the nation—these 351 NCAA D1 basketball colleges are comprised of the most elite basketball players, and potential recruits should be prepared to work hard on and off the court to land a roster spot at one of these Division 1 basketball programs.
When narrowing down your target list, it’s important to consider several factors. First and foremost, student-athletes who have their sights set on attending one of these D1 basketball schools should explore a complete list of D1 basketball colleges, be prepared to meet or exceed competitive recruiting guidelines, and stay up to date on D1 basketball rankings.
For a complete list of Division 1 basketball colleges, including their location and corresponding athletic conference, look at our catalog of Division 1 basketball rankings and D1 basketball schools list below. Is there an AAU boys basketball team near me?
Men’s D1 basketball rankings
Several organizations offer NCAA Division 1 men’s basketball rankings, including the NCAA, USA Today Sports and the Associated Press Top 25 Poll. Here are the top D1 basketball schools, according to the NCSA Power Rankings:
- Stanford University
- University of Florida
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- University of California – Los Angeles – UCLA
- University of Michigan
- Princeton University
- University of California – Berkeley
- Georgia Tech
- Harvard University
- Florida State University
While the NCSA Power Rankings offer a good overview of top D1 basketball schools, student-athletes who hope to compete at one of the 350+ Division 1 basketball colleges shouldn’t limit their search to only the most elite Division 1 basketball programs.
Instead, they should consider several factors when researching D1 basketball teams, including athletic and academic caliber, school size, location, and cost, as well as their own personal preferences.
Full list of D1 basketball colleges
Alcorn State University
Alcorn State, Mississippi
Mid South
Southwestern Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
American University
Washington, District Of Columbia
North East
Patriot League
NCAA D1
Auburn University
Auburn, Alabama
South East
Southeastern Conference
NCAA D1
Bellarmine University
Louisville, Kentucky
Mid East
Great Lakes Valley Conference
NCAA D1
Belmont University
Nashville, Tennessee
Mid East
Ohio Valley Conference
NCAA D1
Boston College
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
New England
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts
New England
Patriot League
NCAA D1
Bradley University
Peoria, Illinois
Great Lakes
Missouri Valley Conference
NCAA D1
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island
New England
Ivy League
NCAA D1
Bryant University
Smithfield, Rhode Island
New England
Northeast Conference
NCAA D1
Bucknell University
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania
North East
Collegiate Water Polo Association
NCAA D1
Butler University
Indianapolis, Indiana
Great Lakes
Pioneer Football League
NCAA D1
Campbell University
Buies Creek, North Carolina
Mid East
Pioneer Football League
NCAA D1
Canisius College
Buffalo, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Clemson University
Clemson, South Carolina
South East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
College of Charleston
Charleston, South Carolina
South East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Davidson College
Davidson, North Carolina
Mid East
Pioneer Football League
NCAA D1
DePaul University
Chicago, Illinois
Great Lakes
Big East Conference
NCAA D1
Drake University
Des Moines, Iowa
Mid West
Pioneer Football League
NCAA D1
Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
North East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina
Mid East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
North East
Northeast Conference
NCAA D1
Elon University
Elon, North Carolina
Mid East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Fairfield University
Fairfield, Connecticut
New England
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Florida A&M University
Tallahassee, Florida
South East
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Furman University
Greenville, South Carolina
South East
Southern Conference
NCAA D1
Georgetown University
Washington, District Of Columbia
North East
Patriot League
NCAA D1
Georgia Tech
Atlanta, Georgia
South East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Gonzaga University
Spokane, Washington
West Coast
West Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Hofstra University
Hempstead, New York
North East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Howard University
Washington, District Of Columbia
North East
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, Indiana
Great Lakes
Missouri Valley Football Conference
NCAA D1
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana
Great Lakes
Big Ten Conference
NCAA D1
Iona College
New Rochelle, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
La Salle University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
North East
Atlantic 10 Conference
NCAA D1
Lafayette College
Easton, Pennsylvania
North East
Patriot League
NCAA D1
Lamar University
Beaumont, Texas
Mid South
Southland Conference
NCAA D1
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
North East
Patriot League
NCAA D1
Liberty University
Lynchburg, Virginia
Mid East
Atlantic Sun Conference
NCAA D1
Lipscomb University
Nashville, Tennessee
Mid East
Atlantic Sun Conference
NCAA D1
Manhattan College
Riverdale, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Marist College
Poughkeepsie, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Merrimack College
North Andover, Massachusetts
New England
Northeast-10 Conference
NCAA D1
Miami University
Oxford, Ohio
Great Lakes
Mid-American Conference
NCAA D1
Monmouth University
West Long Branch, New Jersey
North East
Northeast Conference
NCAA D1
Niagara University
Niagara University, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Ohio University
Athens, Ohio
Great Lakes
Mid-American Conference
NCAA D1
Penn State
University Park, Pennsylvania
North East
Big Ten Conference
NCAA D1
Pepperdine University
Malibu, California
West Coast
Mountain Pacific Sports Federation
NCAA D1
Presbyterian College
Clinton, South Carolina
South East
Big South Conference
NCAA D1
Providence College
Providence, Rhode Island
New England
Big East Conference
NCAA D1
Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana
Great Lakes
Big Ten Conference
NCAA D1
Quinnipiac University
Hamden, Connecticut
New England
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Rider University
Lawrenceville, New Jersey
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey
North East
Big Ten Conference
NCAA D1
Saint Peter's University
Jersey City, New Jersey
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama
South East
Southern Conference
NCAA D1
Siena College
Loudonville, New York
North East
Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
St.
Francis College
Brooklyn Heights, New York
North East
Northeast Conference
NCAA D1
Stanford University
Stanford, California
West Coast
Pacific-12 Conference
NCAA D1
Stetson University
DeLand, Florida
South East
Atlantic Sun Conference
NCAA D1
Stonehill College
Easton, Massachusetts
New England
Norteast Conference (NEC)
NCAA D1
Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York
North East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
North East
American Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas
Mid South
Southeastern Conference
NCAA D1
The Citadel
Charleston, South Carolina
South East
Southern Conference
NCAA D1
Towson University
Towson, Maryland
North East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Troy University
Troy, Alabama
South East
Sun Belt Conference
NCAA D1
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana
Mid South
American Athletic Conference
NCAA D1
United States Military Academy
West Point, New York
North East
Atlantic Hockey Association (Division I for men's ice hockey)
NCAA D1
United States Naval Academy
Annapolis, Maryland
North East
Collegiate Water Polo Association (Division I)
NCAA D1
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida
South East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
South West
Pacific-12 Conference
NCAA D1
Valparaiso University
Valparaiso, Indiana
Great Lakes
Missouri Valley Conference, Pioneer Football League
NCAA D1
Villanova University
Villanova, Pennsylvania
North East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, Virginia
Mid East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
Wagner College
Staten Island, New York
North East
Northeast Conference
NCAA D1
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Mid East
Atlantic Coast Conference
NCAA D1
William & Mary
Williamsburg, Virginia
Mid East
Colonial Athletic Association
NCAA D1
Winthrop University
Rock Hill, South Carolina
South East
Big South Conference
NCAA D1
Wofford College
Spartanburg, South Carolina
South East
Southern Conference
NCAA D1
Xavier University
Cincinnati, Ohio
Great Lakes
Big East Conference
NCAA D1
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut
New England
Ivy League
NCAA D1
How Many Division 1 Basketball Teams Are There in the NCAA?
The NCAA basketball season is fast approaching.
In fact, teams already began practice on September 28th and the season tips off on November 6th! As a huge hoops fan, I for one cannot wait for the year to begin. While the beginning of the year is always a great chance to see your favorite team finally back in action, it also gives you a chance to see some of the year’s top contenders for a coveted spot in the Final Four.
Obviously, not every team can make the Final Four, let alone the NCAA Tournament. With only 68 slots reserved for the tournament, there will be a lot of upset teams ending their seasons on a low note. The simple fact of the matter is that Division 1 basketball consists of several hundreds of teams all looking for success on different levels. For some, it may be trying to end the season with a winning record, for others the Final Four is there only measure on whether or not they had a productive season.
But exactly how many Division 1 college basketball teams are there? The number is pretty staggering and even I, as a self-proclaimed die-hard fan, was surprised at the total.
Yes, you read that right, 353!
These 353 teams are broken up in 32 total conferences with an average of 11 teams per conference playing to both win their conference regular season championship – an honor given to the team with the best in-conference record at the end of the year – and to try and win their conference tournament championship for a trip to the “Big Dance”, the NCAA Tournament. NCAA basketball has come a long way from their first season in 1924, when there were only 8 conferences total!
Let’s take a brief trip down memory lane, shall we? I want to take a look at the number of conferences at the beginning of each decade to show you the rapid growth of the sport over the years. Keep in mind, the first year of NCAA Men’s Division 1 Basketball was 1924:
- 1930: 9 conferences
- 1940: 11 conferences
- 1950: 17 conferences
- 1960: 18 conferences
- 1970: 19 conferences
- 1980: 29 conferences
- 1990: 34 conferences
- 2000: 32 conferences
- 2010: 33 conferences
- 2019: 32 conferences
One of the most attractive aspects NCAA Division 1 Basketball that draws in so many fans is that each of the 351 teams has a chance at making the NCAA Tournament at the beginning of each year.
Yeah, they may not win it all but how many other college sports give their teams the right to play, and sometimes beat, some of the best teams in the country for a chance to win it all.
NCAA Division 1 Football gives what they call the Power Conferences (5 conferences total) the opportunity to play for a national title.
While it would be next to impossible to list all 351 schools, I still wanted to give you, the reader, a chance to do some research on this topic. So below is a link to each conference homepage, with a list of all of the conference champions from last season, so you can see all 351 of the teams somewhere in there and each respective conference champion.
- Conference: 2018-19 Conference Tournament Champion
- America East – Vermont Catamounts
- American – Cincinnati Bearcats
- Atlantic 10 – Saint Louis Billikens
- ACC – Duke Blue Devils
- Atlantic Sun – Liberty Flames
- Big South – Gardner-Webb Runnin’ Bulldogs
- Big 12 – Iowa State Cyclones
- Big East – Villanova Wildcats
- Big Sky – Montana Grizzlies
- Big 10 – Michigan State Spartans
- Big West – UC Irvine Anteaters
- Colonial – Northeastern Huskies
- Conference USA – Old Dominion Monarchs
- Horizon League – Northern Kentucky Norse
- Ivy League – Yale Bulldogs
- MAAC – Iona Gaels
- Mid-American – Buffalo Bulls
- MEAC – North Carolina Central Eagles
- Missouri Valley – Bradley Braves
- Mountain West – Utah State Aggies
- Northeast – Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
- Ohio Valley – Murray State Racers
- Pac 12 – Oregon Ducks
- Patriot League – Colgate Raiders
- SEC – Auburn Tigers
- Southern – Wofford Terriers
- Southland – Abilene Christian Wildcats
- Southwestern – Prairie View A&M Panthers
- Summit League – North Dakota State Bison
- Sun Belt – Georgia State Panthers
- West Coast – Saint Mary’s Gaels
- WAC – New Mexico State Aggies
As we mentioned at the beginning of the piece, the only way for a lot of these teams to make it to the NCAA Tournament is to win their conference tournaments.
So while a team like Duke could technically lose their conference tournament, if they still have a good enough year otherwise, the tournament voters can reward them with what is called an “at-large bid” or a spot in the tournament based on the rest of their season resume. This can include different measurable aspects like strength of schedule, key wins, overall wins, etc.
Unfortunately, a team like North Dakota State from the Summit League just isn’t going to have enough opportunity to earn their spot in the tournament through any other way but to win their conference and earn an “automatic bid” which is given to each conference tournament winner prior to the tournament. A lot of teams live by the motto, “win and you’re in”, literally.
If you have a favorite team, what is their likelihood of making it to the NCAA Tournament each year? Are you a part of a tortured college basketball fanbase? Drop a comment below!
Characteristics of the competitive activity of the leading men's basketball teams of the Russian Superleague "A" Research article in the specialty "Health Sciences"
catches a certain correlation and nature of the manifestation of the typological properties of the nervous system of athletes.
It is advisable to study the prevailing tendencies in the manifestation of the properties of the nervous system of sprinters based on the use of various methods. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that sprinters are characterized by high plasticity, lability of nervous processes; the predominance of the dynamism of the processes of excitation; demonstrate the individual nature of the manifestation of the concentration of nervous processes; tend to have a flexible style of regulation of rhythmic movements.
Accounting for the identified features of the manifestation of the properties of the nervous system of athletes determines the content of the individual trajectory of sports training, based on the choice of rational means, methods that contribute to a more complete self-realization in sports activities.
REFERENCES
1. Ilyin, E.P. Differential psychology of professional activity / E.P. Ilyin. - St. Petersburg. : Peter, 2008. - 432 p.
2.
Nebylitsyn, VD Selected psychological works / V.D. Nebylitsin. -M. : Pedagogy, 1990. - 408 p.
3. Working book of a practical psychologist: technology of effective professional activity: (a manual for specialists working with personnel) / Ed. A.A. Bodaleva, A.A. Derkach L.G. Laptev. - M.: Publishing House of the Institute of Psychotherapy, 2001.- 497 p.
4. Stolyarenko, LD Fundamentals of psychology: workshop / LD Stolyarenko. - Rostov on / D. : Phoenix, 2006. - 704 p.
5. Teplov, BM Typological properties of the nervous system and their significance for psychology. Psychology of individual differences : reader / BM Teplov ; ed. Yu.B. Gippenreiter and V.Ya.Romanova. - M. : CheRo, 2000. - 776 p.
Contact information: [email protected]
Characteristics of the competitive activities of leading male basketball teams of the Russian Super League “A”
Vladimir Ivanovich Kulakov, senior teacher,
Volzhsky Humanitarian Institute (branch)
Volgograd State University (VGI (branch of VGI) ) GOU VPO VolGU),
Volzhsky
Annotation
Based on the correlation analysis of statistical reports of the Russian Basketball Championship among men's teams, the article characterizes the competitive activity of the best Superleague A teams in the 2007-2008 season.
based on their technical and tactical indicators.
Keywords: correlation analysis, basketball, men's teams, superleague, competitive activity.
CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPETITIVE ACTIVITY OF BASKETBALL MALE LEADING TEAMS OF RUSSIAN SUPER LEAGUE «A»
Vladimir Ivanovich Kulakov, the senior teacher,
Volzhsky Humanitarian institute (affiliate) of Volgograd State University,
Volzhsky
Annotation
The article gives the characteristics of competitive activity of the best teams of super league "A" in 2007-2008 years using the correlative analysis of statistical reports of Russian basketball championship among the male teams with reference to their technical and tactic indicators.
Keywords: correlation analysis, basketball, men's teams, super league, competitive activity.
INTRODUCTION
It is well known in the theory and methodology of sports training that the effectiveness of building the training process is determined by the completeness and quality of knowledge about the competitive activity of athletes [1, 2].
On the basis of such data, the most effective means and methods of training, its accentuated orientation at various stages of the training of athletes are determined. Despite the fact that in the scientific literature there is information about the competitive activity of basketball players, but the data on the technical and tactical actions of basketball teams are very limited. This, in turn, creates problems in planning and building the training process for basketball teams with different qualifications.
METHODOLOGY
The data of official statistical reports of the Russian Basketball Championship among men's teams in 2007/2008 were used as the main research material.
The reports quantitatively reflect both individual and team technical and tactical actions: points, 2-point shots scored, 2-point shots made, % of 2-point shots scored, 3-point shots scored, 3-point shots made, % of 3-point shots scored, free throws scored, free throws made, free throw hit %, attacking passes, interceptions, block shots, home rebounds, off-hand rebounds, total rebounds, technical losses, opponent fouls, own fouls.
We analyzed the marked indicators only for the teams that took the results of the Russian Championship 2007-2008. in Superleague "A" 1-6th place: CSKA (Moscow), Khimki (Moscow region), UNICS (Kazan), Triumph (Lyubertsy, Moscow region), Dynamo (Moscow), Ural Great (Perm). The teams in this league played 24 games each.
All obtained results were subjected to correlation analysis.
RESULTS AND THEIR DISCUSSION
Table 1 shows the number of significant correlations formed by the indicators of technical and tactical actions of the studied men's basketball teams.
Semantic analysis has shown that indicator No. 2 (the number of 2-point shots scored) forms the most correlations. There are six such relationships: with No. 1 (the number of points scored), with No. 3 (the number of 2-point shots made), with No. 4 (% of hitting 2-point shots), with No. 11 (the number of attacking passes), with No. 17 ( number of ball losses), c no. 19 (number of own fouls). That is, such an indicator of technical and practical actions as "the number of 2-point shots scored" for this group of men's basketball teams is the semantic center of the studied variables.
Five correlations are found in indicator #1 (number of points scored), and four correlations each are found in indicator #9 (number of free throws made) and #14 (number of rebounds on own backboard). Due to such a number of correlation relationships, the technical and tactical indicators "the number of points scored", "the number of free throws made and the number of rebounds on his backboard" are referred to as semantic nodes.
The number of points scored in one game (indicator No. 1) has correlations with such indicators of technical and tactical actions of basketball players as: No. 2 (number of 2-point shots scored), No. 4 (% of 2-point shots scored) , No. 11 (number of offensive passes), No. 17 (number of turnovers),
43
No. 19 (number of own fouls).
Table 1
The number of significant correlations formed by the indicators of technical and tactical actions of men's basketball teams ____________________________ Superleague "A" in 2007-2008 _______________________
No.
of indicator Reliability level No. of indicators forming correlations Total
2 Р< 0.05 1; 3; four; eleven; 17; 19. 6
1 Р<0.05 2; four; eleven; 17; 19. 5
11 Р<0.05 1; 2; four; 17; 19. 5
19 P<0.05 1; 2; eleven; fourteen; 17. 5
9 Р<0.05 10; fourteen; 16; 18. 4
14 P<0.05 9; 16; eighteen; 19. 4
17 P<0.05 1; 2; eleven; 19. 4
4 Р<0.05 1; 2; 11. 3
5 Р<0.05 6; 12; 13. 3
6 Р<0.05 5; 12; 13. 3
12 Р<0.05 5; 6; 13. 3
13 Р<0.05 5; 6; 12. 3
18 Р<0.05 9; ten; 14. 3
10 Р<0.05 9; 18. 2
16 Р<0.05 9; 14. 2
3 Р<0.05 2. 1
Symbols: No. 1 - scored points; No. 2 - 2-point shots scored; No. 3 - completed 2-point throws; No. 4 - % hit of 2-point shots; No. 5 - 3-point shots scored; No. 6 - completed 3-point throws; No. 7 - % hit of 3-point shots; No. 8 - free throws scored; No. 9 - free throws made; No. 10 - % of hitting free throws; No. 11 - attacking passes; No.
12 - interceptions; No. 13 - block shots; No. 14 - rebounds on your shield; No. 16 - total rebounds; No. 17 - technical losses; No. 18 - opponent's fouls; No. 19- own fouls.
The number of home rebounds (indicator No. 14) of the men's basketball teams that took the lead in the 2007-2008 Russian Championship. in Superleague "A", has correlations with the following indicators of technical and tactical actions: No. 9 (free throws), No. 16 (total number of rebounds), No. 18 (number of opponent's fouls), No. 19 (number of own fouls).
In turn, the indicator of the number of own fouls (indicator No. 19) correlates with indicators: No. 1 (number of goals scored), No. 2 (number of 2-point shots scored), No. 11 (number of offensive passes), No. 14 (number of rebounds on his backboard), No. 17 (number of ball losses) .
On the periphery of the semantic space are those indicators of technical and tactical actions of the best basketball teams of the Superleague "A", which have three or less correlation dependencies.
They are: No. 4 (% of 2-point shots hit), No. 5 (number of 3-point shots scored), No. 12 (number of interceptions), No. 13 (block shots), No. 18 (opponent fouls), No. 10 (free throw hitting %), No. 16 (total rebounds), No. 3 (2-point shots).
The latent hierarchy of indicators of technical and tactical actions established as a result of semantic analysis of the basketball teams of the favorites of the Championship of Russia Superleague "A" 2007-2008. indicates that the players of these teams are oriented, first of all, to the execution and accurate hitting of shots from close and medium distances (2-point shots). In this regard, the competitive games of these teams are dominated by the focus on the maximum number of points scored, which is possible only with a pronounced emphasis on attacking actions. Precisely
therefore, one of the places of the semantic node is the indicator "number of attacking transmissions". As is known, with active attacking actions of basketball team players, the opponent often makes mistakes, which leads to an increase in the significance of such an indicator of competitive activity as “the number of free throws made”.![]()
It should be noted that with the pronounced attacking nature of the game of the Russian basketball leaders' teams, much attention is also paid to active actions in defense. This is evidenced by the semantic node "rebounds on one's backboard". However, it should be emphasized that the best teams of the Russian Superleague "A" attacking technical and tactical actions from close and medium distance still prevail over defensive actions.
Nevertheless, the semantic analysis of indicators of technical and technical actions of the national basketball leaders' teams in the Championship of Russia in 2007-2008 only gives a general idea of the significance of this or that factor, and does not reflect the structure of competitive activity in general.
In order to establish the characteristic features of the competitive activity of the considered basketball teams, correlation pleiades were constructed. This is clearly shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Correlation galaxy, reflecting the number of significant correlations formed by the indicators of technical and tactical actions of the men's basketball teams of the Superleague "A" in the Russian Championship 2007-2008.![]()
So, the graphic image clearly shows that the main technical and tactical actions of the leading men's basketball teams of the Superleague "A" of the Russian Championship 2007-2008. form two correlation pleiades. We list these pleiades in descending order of their importance in the structure of the competitive activity of the studied basketball teams, which is determined by the power and strength of the correlation relationships of the indicators of technical and tactical actions of the players.
The first correlation galaxy, the most significant in terms of power and strength, consists of 12 interrelated indicators of technical and tactical actions. It clearly distinguishes four indicators that are interconnected with most of the technical and tactical actions of the basketball players of the leading teams of the Russian Superleague "A". These are No. 2 (number of 2-point shots scored), No. 1 (total number of points scored), No. 11 (total number of offensive passes) and No.![]()
19 (number of own
fouls).
So, first of all, it must be emphasized that the total number of points scored by the considered basketball teams has a statistically significant positive correlation (r = 0.78) with the number of 2-point shots scored. That is, the more and more productive the team of basketball players made shots from close and medium distances, the greater is the total number of points scored. The same positive correlation exists between total points scored and offensive passes. But with the number of ball losses, the correlation is negative (r = -0.96). Negative correlation between the final result of the best basketball teams and the number of own fouls (r=-0.97). This means that if a team during a competitive game makes fewer ball losses and violates the rules of the competition less, then its effectiveness increases.
The second correlation galaxy, which is significantly inferior to the first in terms of power and strength, united only four indicators of technical and tactical actions of basketball players.
This is the number of shots made and scored from a long distance (3-point shots), the number of interceptions and block shots.
CONCLUSION
Thus, it can be stated that the competitive activity of the best men's basketball teams of the Russian Superleague "A" in the season of games 2007-2008. typical:
- predominance of active attacking technical-tactical actions in the structure of competitive activity;
- attacking technical and tactical actions are aimed at the execution and high efficiency of throws from close and medium distances;
- long-range shots (3-point shots) and free throws, as well as their effectiveness, do not have a significant impact on the overall outcome of the game.
LITERATURE
1. Matveev, L.P. Fundamentals of the general theory of sports and the system of training athletes / L.P. Matveev. - Kyiv: Olympic Literature, 1999. - 318 p.
2. Platonov, V.N. General theory of training athletes in Olympic sports / V.
N. Platonov. - Kyiv: Olympic Literature, 1997. - 584 p.
Contact information: [email protected]
ALGORITHM FOR INDIVIDUAL MANAGEMENT OF THE TECHNICAL TRAINING OF SKILLED HAMMER THROWERS Vladimir Evgenyevich Lutkovsky, Associate Professor,
National State University of Physical Culture, Sports and Health named after P.F. Lesgafta, Saint-Petersburg,
(NSU named after PF Lesgaft, Saint-Petersburg)
Annotation
The paper presents the mechanism of individual control of the technical training of hammer throwers based on the developed classification of motion technique elements. The purposeful use of projectiles of non-standard weight is proposed as the determining means of correcting the technique.
Keywords: technical training management, hammer throwing, non-standard weight projectiles.
Home / Student Basketball Association
News categories
November 08
Belarusian teams reached the "TOP" of the Student League of Russian Railways
07 November
October MVP voting begins
November 02
On October 25, the third season of the All-Russian competition of sports projects "You are in the game" started
01 November
We start accepting applications for the DanceFire Student Basketball Cheerleading Festival
October 31
On December 1-2, ITMO University in St.
Petersburg will host the IX All-Russian Forum "Actual Issues in the Development of University Sports"
October 31
The first full-time stage of the educational project "ASB University" for authorized representatives of the Association and managers of the Student League of Russian Railways was completed in Moscow
October 30
Rinata Gerasimova: “In this team I play for my own pleasure and I want to be useful”
October 29
Active Saturday as part of the in-person stage of the ASB University project
October 28
From October 21 to October 23, the in-person stage of the Internship Program project was held at the Site
28 October
The first face-to-face stage of the ASB University educational project started in Moscow
SEE ALL
Videos
View all
"The beauty of CSB". Anastasia Kournikova is not a tennis player, but she could have been, if not for basketball
Beauty of ASB: Alena Chernova
Vyacheslav Yamandiy won the third qualifying tournament of the cyberbasket "Move Up"
Eduard Raud: “The main thing I want to show during the “Move Up” seminar is the novelty in building a team defense”
Ivan Kucherov: "The key aspect of the performance is the simulation of those situations that will be repeated in the game"
Pavel Ryabichev: “At the “Move Up” seminar, he spoke about the things without which the development of players is impossible”
Boris Ponkratov: “I know that the Upward Movement seminar is in demand”
Dmitry Shakulin: “I am glad that through the “Move Up” project there is an opportunity to share my knowledge”
St.
Petersburg
165
Subscribers
10
Publications
300
Games per season
70
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
Student League of Russian Railways
161
subscribers
208
Publications
150
Games in the season
14
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
Moscow
86
Subscribers
9
Publications
400
Games per season
64
Teams
64
SUBSCRIBE
Premier Division Center
60
Subscribers
12
Publications
80
Games per season
12
Teams SUBSCRIBE Team SUBSCRIBE
Volga-Ural
87
subscribers
10
Publications
100
Games in the season
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
St.
Petersburg
165
Subscribers
10
Publications
300
Games per season
1
Teams SUBSCRIBE
Student League of Russian Railways
161
subscribers
208
Publications
150
Games in the season
2
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
Moscow
86
Subscribers
9
Publications
400
Games per season
1
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
Premier Division Center
60
Subscribers
12
Publications
80
Games per season
Teams
SUBSCRIBE
Siberia
61
Subscribers
7
Publications
200
Games per season
Teams
3 SUBSCRIBE
Povolzhye-Ural
87
Subscribers
10
Publications
100
Games per season
Teams 9002 SUBSCRIBE
Internship program at the head office
Do you want to change student sports for the better? We want to offer you a great opportunity to realize all your bold ideas!
Open
ASB 3x3
This project is the only street basketball competition of its kind among students in Russia.
